A place for letters of love and support from his father, Jeff, and family and friends, if Grant were able to find this site.
If you wish to submit a public letter to Grant, and in support of Jeff Reichert, you may submit it to Mike Phillips via email at MikeThunderPhillips@gmail.com.
Lawsuit Filed in Baltimore County Alleging Illegal Protective Orders, Court Misconduct, and Years-Long Separation of Father and Son
Jeff Reichert, a disabled U.S. Army veteran, has filed a lawsuit against multiple parties, including the State of Maryland, after being separated from his son for nearly four years due to illegal protective orders and court failures. The case highlights systemic issues regarding parental rights and the enforcement of unserved or defective orders.
The Case Against Sarah Hornbeck: An Exposé of Lies, Abuse, Crimes, and the System That Enabled Them
A federal judge has allowed Reichert v. Hornbeck to move forward, centering on allegations that false protective orders and fabricated criminal complaints were used to trigger wrongful arrests and sever a father’s relationship with his son. The case now proceeds on a focused malicious-prosecution claim, putting the alleged weaponization of family and criminal courts squarely…
Concordia Prep’s Dirty Secret: How a Christian School and Its Lawyer Colluded to Erase a Father
A Christian preparatory school that preaches faith and character is accused of doing the opposite behind closed doors. Concordia Prep’s Dirty Secret details how Concordia Preparatory School and its attorney allegedly concealed a child’s enrollment, selectively enforced court orders, silenced a minor’s voice, and helped erase a father from his son’s life—triggering imminent litigation and…
Friday Night Lights, Dark Family Secrets: How a Father Who Won Was Erased — And Who Profited
A Maryland father who once beat the family court system and won full custody has been systematically erased from his son’s life. From protective orders to police intimidation and schools shutting their doors, every institution has been weaponized to enforce his absence. This isn’t a custody dispute. It’s a hit — executed in plain sight…
Fathers’ Rights Are Not an Excuse—They’re a Crisis
The author emphasizes that fathers often face systemic barriers in family courts, leading to significant emotional and financial struggles despite their efforts to maintain parental relationships. The case of Jeff Reichert illustrates these issues, revealing that even knowledgeable and determined fathers can be effectively erased from their children’s lives. Both parents’ involvement is crucial for…
The Opportunist: From Gun Board Failure to Family Court Predator
John H. Michel, a Maryland attorney, exemplifies reckless ambition and opportunism. Rejected from the Handgun Permit Review Board for endangering public safety, he pivoted to family law, manipulating circumstances following his wife’s death to gain influence over a child. Observers criticize his lack of qualifications and dangerous tendencies in parenting and public service.
Concordia Preparatory School: A Tarnished Legacy of Misconduct and Misplaced Priorities
Concordia Preparatory School in Towson, Maryland, is facing a legacy of lawsuits, a student sex assault conviction, and accusations of prioritizing athletics over safety and academics. Despite denying wrongdoing and citing a “zero-tolerance” policy, critics say Concordia has fostered a culture of misconduct and secrecy that raises serious questions for parents considering enrollment.
Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame
In Maryland, a father can be jailed for fighting false accusations in family court while a teenager who commits an armed carjacking is released the same night. Parents like Jeff Reichert have been punished more severely for wanting to see their children than violent offenders face for terrorizing communities. At times, it seems easier to…
Family Court as Legalized Child Trafficking: The Case of Reichert v. Hornbeck
The Reichert v. Hornbeck case in Maryland exposes a troubling aspect of American family courts, where parental rights are commodified and children are treated as assets. Jeff Reichert’s fight against wrongful judicial maneuvers highlights systemic issues, resembling trafficking. The case exemplifies how financial motives can lead to unjust legal outcomes for families.
Child Support & “Double Dipping” – The Absurd Economics of Erasing a Parent
The Reichert v. Hornbeck case highlights a troubling practice in Maryland’s family court, where a biological father is forced to pay child support while being replaced by the mother’s partner as the child’s legal father. This scenario raises concerns over parental rights, financial exploitation, and the psychological impact on the child, urging lawmakers to address…
