This is not a custody story.
It’s a systems story.
The Explainer Series breaks down the legal procedures, power dynamics, and quiet failures surrounding Jeff Reichert’s case—in plain English, without spin.
Family court operates behind closed doors. Orders are issued quickly. Records are sealed. Appeals are rare. And once a narrative takes hold, it can become almost impossible to unwind—regardless of the facts.
This series exists to explain how that happens.
What This Series Covers
- How protective orders work—and how they can be misused
- What “due process” actually means in family court
- Why temporary orders often become permanent punishment
- How evidence is weighed (and ignored)
- Why defending yourself can be used against you
- Why judges, attorneys, and court actors face little accountability
Each explainer focuses on process, not personalities—using one real case to illuminate a broader system that affects parents nationwide.
Why It Matters
You don’t need to take a side to understand a system.
You just need transparency.
If courts can remove parents, restrict contact, or reshape families without meaningful safeguards, the public deserves to know how—and why.
Start Here
Read the explainers in order, or jump to any topic that matters to you.
Each piece stands alone—but together, they tell a bigger story.
This is the case, explained.
What Is a Protective Order—and How Can It Be Weaponized?
Protective orders aim to prevent harm but expose vulnerabilities in the family court system, allowing severe restrictions based on unverified claims with minimal due process. Issued swiftly, these orders can profoundly impact individuals, often becoming the foundation for future legal actions. The imbalance between protection and rights can lead to systemic abuse, necessitating greater scrutiny…
Who Is Jeff Reichert—and Why This Case Matters
The article discusses the complexities of family court cases, using Jeff Reichert’s situation as a case study. It highlights how procedural decisions, rather than factual evidence, often determine outcomes, impacting parent-child relationships. The emphasis is on the lack of transparency and accountability within the system, underscoring broader structural issues affecting many litigants.
