On an August night in Prince George’s County, Maryland, a high school football game at Bishop McNamara should have been a routine community event. Students cheered. Parents filled the bleachers. The Friday evening sun glared down on a spirited contest.
But for one father, Jeff Reichert, the game was more than football. It was a chance to see his son, Grant, for the first time in almost four years. What unfolded instead was not a reunion but a chilling demonstration: how courts, schools, police, and political power can be weaponized to erase a father who once beat the system.
This is not family law gone wrong. This is a hit.
A Father Who Built His Son’s World
Jeff is not an “every other weekend” dad. He raised his son. He built Grant’s childhood.
For years, Jeff coached soccer, baseball, lacrosse, basketball, and football. He ran practices, drew up plays, taught fundamentals, and gave pep talks. He was the steady presence on the sidelines, the man who taught Grant how to win with humility and lose with dignity. Jeff says bluntly: “I am the reason he even likes sports.”
That history matters because it shows what was stolen. When Grant was taken from him, Sarah Hornbeck, Jeff’s ex, refused to let Grant participate in sports. Only when Sarah needed a new means of control, did she allow Grant to join teams. Now, Sarah uses sports as a weapon — threatening to take them away if Grant shows a desire to see his father, Jeff.
And this isn’t speculation. It’s a pattern parents in coercive households describe again and again: a beloved activity dangled like a carrot, used to silence or control a child’s voice. For Grant, the very outlet his father gave him is now the chain used to hold him in line.
A Rare Victory in Family Court
To understand why Jeff’s case is different, you need to know what came before.
For more than 15 years now, Jeff has battled through custody litigation. Twice he went to trial. Twice he won. In a state where fathers rarely leave court with more than alternate weekends, Jeff achieved what many attorneys would call impossible: full custody.
He did it by proving his stability, his commitment, and his bond with his son. He fought back against false accusations and came out on top. For twelve years, he beat a system stacked against men.
That victory mattered. It embarrassed powerful players in Maryland’s family-law world. It threatened a system that thrives on endless litigation, child-support enforcement, and keeping fathers marginalized. In Jeff’s words: “Maryland already hated me for winning.”
The irony is devastating. The very fact that he succeeded as a father became the reason he was marked for destruction.
The Bishop McNamara Game
Jeff drove more than four hours through heavy traffic to reach Bishop McNamara. That drive was not casual. It was the act of a father willing to endure anything just to glimpse his son.
When the final whistle blew, Grant spotted him. He stopped. There was a flicker of recognition. Jeff stepped forward for a hug.
That was the moment the fear surfaced. Grant froze, raised his arm, and blocked the embrace. His face bent with terror. Jeff says his son looked “scared shitless.”
The fear didn’t arise naturally. It was manufactured.
Then the enforcement came. Head coach Joe Battaglia and his assistants physically grabbed Grant, wrapped around him, and walked him off the field and to the locker room. They manhandled a teenage boy not to protect him, but to enforce alienation.
Jeff called out: “I love you. Call me.”
Grant never spoke. He never turned back. He was hustled away like property by adults who should have protected his agency, not stripped it.
For Jeff, the moment was devastating and unimaginable. It was not rejection. It was execution.
To those of us watching, it did not look like rejection. It looked like cold-blooded fear—the kind instilled in a child pressured to shun a parent. And for Grant Reichert to show fear in the presence of his dad, that pressure had to be extremely confusing and overwhelming.
And then came the long, lonely drive home — four more hours to replay the scene in his head. A father who once held his son through wins and losses now reduced to watching strangers drag him away.
Sarah’s Vanishing Act
The night’s strangeness didn’t end there. Before this unfolded, Sarah Hornbeck vanished. During halftime she left the stadium grounds for her car for nearly half an hour, even though halftime had been shortened due to an injury.
When she returned to the stadium she skipped returning to the bleachers. She carried a folding chair and chose to sit apart from the crowd. When she realized the game was called after a fight, she left completely and never returned to the stands.
Her behavior raised questions: Why disappear at a critical moment? Why the extended absence? Why remove herself from the stands? Why leave when tensions rose? Was she going to her car to sneak a drink? To onlookers, it looked less like chance and more like choreography.
The Shadow of John Michel
Looming over every moment and ordeal is Sarah’s partner, attorney John Michel.
Michel controls access. He monitors phones. He inserts himself into communications. In 2023, when Jeff and Grant managed a brief phone call, Michel stood beside the boy, tape-recording the conversation. Grant fears consequences if he mentions his father’s name and certainly if he shows affection toward his father.
He has projected himself at school as though he were the father — and the school has played along.
Courts have not only tolerated this; they have empowered it. Jeff once had full custody of his son. He was the custodial parent for years. But in a reversal that defies logic, judges have allowed Michel to intervene as Grant’s “de facto” (legal) father, to rewrite reality, and to replace the biological father with a courtroom stranger. Papers are allegedly being filed for Michel to adopt Grant.
This is not parenting. It is identity theft carried out under color of law.
This sets a dangerous precedent where step-partners can effectively replace parents in custody disputes, undermining fundamental parental rights.
Barred From Concordia Prep
The week after McNamara, Concordia Prep in Towson hosted a home game against a Long Island team. Jeff wanted to be there. He couldn’t.
A protective order — one of six — made it an arrestable offense for him to step on school grounds. He has been illegally arrested several times. Beaten in his own home. His civil rights have been completely disregarded. Jeff is afraid to go to Maryland.
This wasn’t theoretical. Police had already been called on Wayne Lynch, a longtime family friend, and other Black men who came to support Jeff. Their only “crime” was being associated with him. Law enforcement’s selective response revealed the deeper bias: certain people weren’t welcome, and neither was the father.
Jeff couldn’t risk arrest in front of his son. So, he stayed away. Instead, he paid people to attend games and take photos so he could glimpse Grant’s life from afar. That is not co-parenting. That is exile.
I went in his place. John Michel and Sarah Hornbeck were in the crowd. As I entered the stadium, they made eye contact with me as though they knew exactly who I was. It felt like a spaghetti western stare down. And like clockwork, they disappeared during halftime, slipping away from the stadium for an extended stretch.
This time, it wasn’t even possible to get close to Grant. Despite repeated efforts to gain access through administrators—emails, calls, and direct outreach—no school officials appeared willing to step in. The same Concordia Prep administrators who had been contacted by me about Jeff’s parental access were nowhere to be found. No access. No accountability. Just silence.
Jeff’s absence was forced—not voluntary. The system had barred him from even sitting in the bleachers to watch his son play. Once again, the system ensured Jeff’s erasure.
Annapolis: Retaliation in Real Time
At a later game in Annapolis between Concordia Prep and St. Mary’s, the pattern repeated. But this time the retaliation was explicit. Another game that Jeff could not attend.
The morning of the game, police showed up at Jeff’s house. Why? Is it because the day before, I published an exposé on Michel’s legal career and his attempt to replace Jeff as Grant’s father? Within hours, Sarah Hornbeck filed yet another protective order in Maryland—number six. It was granted instantly. Police in Virginia delivered it like muscle. The question must be asked: How is it legal to file so many? It’s not. So how does the court get away with turning a blind eye to it?
Jeff already has a federal lawsuit pending over this exact misuse of protective orders by Sarah. The case has survived motions to dismiss and currently is in discovery. But state courts didn’t care. They keep stacking orders, one on top of another, each one further criminalizing fatherhood.
Once again, Jeff was erased before the game even began.
Again, I went in his place.
The pattern played out yet again. Michel and Hornbeck were present in the stands—but left the game early, keeping themselves at the edges.
At halftime, I approached the sidelines and called out to Grant: “Your dad loves you. Call him.”
He looked at me. Recognition flashed. Then he turned away.
Even hearing his father’s love through another voice was too dangerous. The conditioning had taken hold.
Did he remember me from the Bishop McNamara game? Did Michel and Sarah tell him not to speak to me either? Because this kind of change doesn’t happen naturally. It happens when outside influence is strong, steady, and manipulative.
A Bond Jeff Reichert Fights to Protect
Jeff has told me about the bond he shared with his son, a bond that remained strong even during years of forced separation. This bond is obvious by the photos, videos, and stories he has shared with me, most notably an interview with Wayne Dolcifino where Grant spoke glowingly about his father.
As recently as January 2025, father and son spoke warmly, sharing stories and a closeness that survived against the odds. Grant also shared his experiences of the abuse he has continued to endure
But now, just months later, the boy’s reaction was one of withdrawal, avoidance, and rejection.
Protective Orders as Weapons
The larger story here isn’t just Sarah’s behavior, Michel’s interference, or even a coach shielding a boy from his father. It’s the family court system that made this possible.
Protective orders are supposed to protect genuine victims of abuse. In Maryland, they are granted ex parte — often without the accused present — and can be issued in a matter of minutes. Once in place, they carry enormous consequences: exclusion from home, loss of access to children, arrest for stepping on school grounds.
In Jeff’s case, at least six orders were issued. They were not about protection. They were about leverage. Each one cut him further from his son. Each one criminalized fatherhood. Each one isolated him socially and professionally. Meanwhile, any filed by him were denied.
This is how Maryland operates. Courts hand out orders without evidence. Schools enforce them blindly. Police act as muscle. Fathers are erased. Abusers are protected. All in attempt to create a false narrative that essentially turns good fathers into criminals for the crime of being good fathers.
The Career Kill
The campaign didn’t just take Jeff’s son. It took his career. It stole his ability to coach.
Being a dad cost him everything. He left a successful career to focus on fatherhood. Instead of finding support, his network turned on him.
Employers backed away. Professional opportunities evaporated. Colleagues distanced themselves. Protective orders and police visits poisoned his reputation. Each new filing became another brick in the wall hindering his ability to work.
He also can no longer coach. Besides being too painful for him without Grant, the number of false arrests took its toll on Jeff.
Jeff had beaten the family court system — twice. He made law in Maryland. His case has been thoroughly studied and is cited as a “seminal” case in Maryland Family Law.
He had full custody. That fact alone made him a threat. Maryland could not allow a man to prove it was possible. So, they destroyed him, publicly and professionally, to erase the example.
This wasn’t collateral damage. It was the point.
Who Benefits?
The system doesn’t move this aggressively for nothing. The hit served multiple beneficiaries.
- Michel gained the ability to play father.
- Sarah gained control through fear.
- Schools avoided messy transparency by siding with power.
- Judges protected their reputations by silencing a father who had beaten them in open court.
- Police enforced alienation instead of law.
- Former employers also protect their reputations by silencing a former employee who knows things they don’t want you to know.
And at the top sits the governor and attorney general – one who served directly with Jeff in the Army. Nothing this coordinated happens without approval. The courts, schools, and law enforcement didn’t act in isolation. They acted as a system.
This wasn’t error. It was execution.
So, who’s pulling the strings?
This isn’t random. It isn’t accidental. It’s deliberate.
The schools, judges, and police have been used as pawns for the powerful to weaponize against their enemies. It is sickening and emblematic of the problem in this country with our ruling elite. They feel they are untouchable. It seems like Jeff may be starting to touch them because this is unheard of.
The Child Left Behind
At the heart of this is a boy who has been broken down.
Grant once clung to his father with joy. Now he recoils in fear. He has been taught that love for his dad equals punishment.
This is not estrangement. It is coercion. It is child abuse carried out under the guise of legal process.
Psychologists have studied this phenomenon for decades. Coercive control and parental alienation produce lasting scars: fractured identity, chronic anxiety, depression, and difficulty forming secure attachments in adulthood. Grant’s reaction at McNamara — terror in the face of love — is textbook.
That is not justice. That is abuse administered by the state.
What Must Happen Next
If this story ends only as another howl into the void, the system wins. To stop the hit from repeating, there must be action.
- Independent Investigation: Launch a bipartisan probe into protective orders and police conduct in Jeff’s case. Subpoena school emails, judicial filings, and law enforcement logs.
- Legislative Oversight: Hold state hearings on weaponized protective orders and ex parte procedures. Require courts to justify orders with evidence.
- School Accountability: Investigate Concordia and other schools for compliance and complicity. Demand transparency on how custody documents are reviewed.
- Police Review: Independent auditors must examine why Black men were targeted while others were not.
- Public Records Campaign: Journalists and advocates must file FOIAs across agencies to trace the paper trail.
- Victim-Centered Remedies: Courts must prioritize reunification and sanction bad actors.
The Friday Night Exposé
The football field should have been about touchdowns and community pride. Instead, it exposed corruption and control, and a larger pattern of alienation and trafficking.
When you line up the facts, a clear pattern emerges:
- A father is continuously silenced.
- A son is conditioned to turn away and fear him.
- A mother manipulates outcomes while she routinely vanishes at critical moments.
- A partner replacing a parent by exerting undue control.
- Coaches enforce lies, not orders, while shielding the child.
- Schools closing doors, stonewalling access and looking the other way.
- Police delivering threats.
- Courts are complicit at every step enforcing protective orders that make even showing up to a football game a potential crime.
This is not family law. This is a hit. Someone is profiting. Someone is receiving favors. Someone is gaining or using political influence. It is evil. The system is broken. The system is corrupt.
Jeff’s drive home from Bishop McNamara — four hours replaying the image of coaches dragging his son away — should stand as proof. Maryland doesn’t just fail fathers. It eliminates them.
Devastating. Unimaginable. And deliberate.
Discover more from Reform Maryland Courts
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
