By Michael Phillips | Originally posted on MDBayNews.com

I wasn’t planning to write this article. In fact, I was working on something else entirely when I stumbled upon the court file of Jeffrey Reichert v. Sarah Hornbeck, a child custody case out of Anne Arundel County, Maryland.

And I said, out loud, “Holy f@#$ing s&!@.”

This is not just a case. This is a portal to the underworld of family court — a Kafkaesque saga that’s been dragging on for fifteen years. Four — count them, FOUR — unpublished appellate opinions. A child, Grant, now 15, who hasn’t seen his father in 3.5 years. A father who’s been trying to navigate a maze of court rulings, custody evaluators, and psychological warfare that defies logic or law. And a mother, Sarah Hornbeck, whose path through this legal quagmire raises more questions than answers.

Let’s start here:
Who the hell are these people?

And I’m not being flippant. If you’ve never heard of them, that’s not your fault. This case — despite being cited in law school seminars — is effectively buried. Unpublished. Hidden. Sealed. Sanitized.
Why?

Because if the public ever read the full record, they’d lose trust in the entire judicial system.

The Reichert File: Questions That Won’t Die

Who is Sarah Hornbeck, and how has she pulled this off?
How does one woman become the central figure in a 15-year custody war and emerge largely unscathed by judicial scrutiny? How does she maintain custody, avoid accountability for apparent alienation, and still get the courts to act like she’s the one needing protection? Is she connected? Or just incredibly good at playing the system?

Who the hell is Jeff Reichert, and is he a criminal?
That name keeps coming up. A shadowy figure allegedly close to Hornbeck — allegedly controlling, allegedly dangerous — yet seemingly untouched by court orders, untouched by investigation, despite multiple arrests related to the case. The allegations around him are chilling. So why is no one asking questions about him in a court supposedly designed to act “in the best interest of the child”?

What the hell has Grant experienced through all this?
The boy at the center of this never asked for any of it. He’s had therapists, custody evaluators, and probably more subpoenas in his life than most adults. Where is his voice? Why does his story keep disappearing in court documents? Has he been alienated? Weaponized? Protected? Forgotten?

Why are there four unpublished appellate opinions?
Four. That’s not just rare — that’s statistically absurd. And yet not a single one has been published. They are unavailable to cite in future cases, even though this case is taught in Maryland law schools as a critical precedent in parental alienation, court discretion, and custody modifications.
Why the silence? What are Maryland courts hiding?

Why Anne Arundel County?
This case started out in Baltimore. Neither parent lives in Anne Arundel. Jeffrey Reichert lives in Virginia, Sarah Hornbeck in Maine. Yet this whole circus is playing out in Anne Arundel. Was this venue-shopped? Is there a jurisdictional connection to someone with power or influence? What’s the local politics here?

Deeper Cuts

• How does a father lose all access to his child with no abuse, no neglect, no criminal record, and where he initially had full custody?
• What judge(s) have presided over this, and what’s their record on parental alienation or due process?
• What role have GALs (Guardian ad Litems), custody evaluators, or therapists played? Were they vetted? Were their recommendations followed?
• Has anyone profited off this case? Custody consultants, expert witnesses, supervised visitation centers?
• What is the legal bill? And who’s paying it?
• What happens when the family court becomes an ecosystem designed to perpetuate itself — not resolve conflict?

A System That Can’t Be Real — But Is

I’ve witnessed a lot of dysfunction in my time, and covered my fair share since I began writing — bureaucratic ineptitude, judicial bias, political cowardice — but nothing quite prepared me for this case. Reichert v. Hornbeck is either a masterclass in systemic failure or a template for how to erase a parent using procedure and psychology rather than truth and justice.

This is just the beginning. I plan to publish a series of exposés on this case — on the people involved, the judges who ruled, the ghost opinions, the disappearances from the record, and the long-term damage it has caused.

Because someone has to ask:

• How does a custody case last 15 years and end with a father erased?
• How do judges sleep after signing orders that cut a child off from a loving parent without clear findings of abuse or danger?
• And how many other cases like this are buried in Maryland’s unpublished opinions, collecting dust while children grow up without their fathers? Mine included.

Stay tuned.

If you have tips, documents, or experience with the Maryland family court system — especially Anne Arundel County — contact me confidentially at mikethunderphillips@gmail.com.
Let’s shine a light on the dark places.

---

Support Independent Journalism That Dares to Ask the Hard Questions
If you’re tired of sugar-coated stories and censored courtrooms, help keep fearless reporting alive. Your donation empowers me to dig deeper, expose the truth, and give voice to those the system tries to silence.

👉 Donate now and be part of the movement for transparency, justice, and accountability. Every dollar helps fight the silence.